dostępność2025.pl
Appearance
Language
fot. fancycrave1 · Pixabay

Technique · EN 301 549 · ETSI, CEN and CENELEC

EN 301 549 — the standard nobody reads and everybody has to meet

The Polish Accessibility Act never mentions WCAG. It speaks of “perceivability, operability, understandability and compatibility” (art. 12(2)(3)) and of a presumption of conformity for whatever meets a harmonised standard (art. 20). That standard is EN 301 549 — “Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services”. Its clause 9 restates the WCAG 2.1 level A and AA success criteria as technical requirements. That is the whole mechanism: law → standard → WCAG.

Who publishes it, and where it came from

EN 301 549 is a joint standard of the three European standardisation organisations — ETSI, CEN and CENELEC — originally written on a European Commission request (mandate M/376) as a set of accessibility requirements for public procurement of ICT. The first version dates from 2014. Version V3.2.1 (2021‑03) is the one the Commission cited in the Official Journal of the European Union under Directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of public sector websites. That citation is not a formality: it is what turns a voluntary standard into a harmonised one, and a harmonised standard is what a presumption of conformity flows from.

Under the European Accessibility Act the Commission asked the same organisations to update the standard (mandate M/587). ETSI has published a newer version, but to date none has been cited in the Official Journal under the EAA. The practical consequence for a company is single and worth remembering: the formal presumption of conformity under art. 20(1) of the Polish act is not operating yet, and the only measure an enforcement body will reach for is EN 301 549 anyway — that is, WCAG 2.1 AA.

What is inside — clause by clause

ClauseWhat it coversWho should care
4Functional performance statements — eleven user situations (without vision, without hearing, with limited manipulation…)everyone; this is the “why” behind the rest
5Generic requirements: activation of accessibility features, biometrics, preservation of information, authorised accesshardware and platform makers
6ICT with two-way voice communication (RTT, video calls, audio quality)telecoms, messaging apps
7ICT with video capabilities: captions, audio description, and carrying both through the whole chainmedia, VOD, e‑learning
8Hardware: ATMs, ticket machines, terminals, keyboardsbanking, transport, retail
9 — “Web”WCAG 2.1 A and AA, criterion by criterion, as requirements 9.1.1.1 – 9.4.1.3, plus 9.6 (WCAG conformance requirements)every website and every shop
10Non-web documents: PDF, DOCX, spreadsheets, e‑books — the same criteria applied to a fileanyone who publishes PDFs and terms
11Software, including mobile apps: the same criteria plus user preferences and authoring toolsiOS/Android apps, CMS platforms
12Documentation and support services: manuals and help must themselves be accessible and describe the accessibility featurescustomer service, legal
13Relay services and access to emergency numberstelecoms, public sector

Then the annexes: A (relationship with EU law), B (the correspondence table with WCAG), C (the checklist used for conformity assessment, filled in “satisfied / not satisfied / not applicable”) and D–E (guidance). When somebody asks you for a “declaration of conformity with EN 301 549”, they almost always mean a completed Annex C.

Clause 4: eleven situations, not eleven diagnoses

Clause 4 is the only part of the standard written in human language rather than in code. It describes use without vision, with limited vision, without perception of colour, without hearing, with limited hearing, without vocal capability, with limited manipulation or strength, with limited reach, with limited cognition, with minimised photosensitive seizure triggers, and with privacy. That last one is the most frequently forgotten: if the only route to the goal is having your balance read out loud or asking the cashier for help, the feature is accessible and the service is not.

What it means for a site owner

  • Site and shop: clause 9 = WCAG 2.1 AA. You do not have to buy the standard to know what to do — the WCAG criteria are public and identical in substance.
  • Mobile app: clause 11, not 9. The same criteria, but tested in the operating system rather than the browser — with TalkBack and VoiceOver.
  • PDFs and terms: clause 10. Terms and conditions in an untagged PDF are non-conformant even when the site around them is exemplary. How to fix that.
  • Support: clause 12. The complaints channel required by art. 37 is a service too — a contact form a screen reader cannot use closes the route of appeal.
  • You do not need a certificate. There is no certification body for services in this system; there is your own conformity assessment (art. 32(1)) and documentation you must be able to produce.

How to cite it so that it means something

“Compliant with EN 301 549”, with no version, no clause and no date of testing, is decoration rather than a statement. A useful sentence looks like this:

template

“The conformity assessment of the service was carried out on 12 March 2026 against EN 301 549 V3.2.1, clause 9 (WCAG 2.1 level AA). Conformity was established with the exception of criteria 1.2.5 and 2.5.8 on archived pages; remediation planned by 30 June 2026.”

The kind of paragraph an enforcement body takes seriously — because it has scope, a date, a version of the standard and a list of exceptions

Exceptions are not a confession. An exception recorded with a remediation date is evidence that the assessment actually happened; no exceptions at all in a first assessment is a sign that it did not.

Where to read it

The standard is available free of charge as a PDF from ETSI (document EN 301 549 in the standards register). It runs to over 150 pages and is written for test laboratories, not for shop owners. A reading order that saves a week: clause 4 (why), the table in Annex B (what maps to what in WCAG), then clause 9 or 10 or 11 — whichever applies to your product — and Annex C when it is time to document.

Test your site against clause 9

We can do it for you

Two routes to compliance. Both start with the report, so the quote is about your site rather than about an average one.

Remediation

We will fix your site

We take the whole-site report and clear it item by item — code, theme, content — until it meets WCAG 2.2 AA.

  • contrast, focus, labels, headings and touch targets put right
  • cart, sign-in, checkout and forms walked as one journey (art. 18)
  • the accessibility statement for your terms (art. 32(2)(1))
  • a complaints procedure with its 30-day deadline (art. 37)
  • a re-check after deployment — in writing, for your file

Ask for a quote

New website

Or we will build you a new one

Modern and good-looking, designed to be accessible from the first line — not a site with an overlay bolted on afterwards.

  • WCAG 2.2 AA throughout, AAA where it is achievable (7:1 contrast, no time limits)
  • three themes: light, dark and high contrast
  • read the page aloud at one button press — exactly like this site
  • full keyboard and screen-reader support, no accessibility overlays
  • fast: no dependencies, no tracking, four languages if you need them

Ask for a quote

A quote follows the report, usually within 2 working days. VAT invoice from Castomo P.S.A. Start with the free check.